Can’t do an assignment? Get it done by a trustworthy essay writing service
A small company is looking for a department manager. There have been many applications, and various tests have been carried out on the candidates. The group working on this is now left with four candidates, whom they have also interviewed.
The group asks you if you can look at the information they have about the candidates and make an assessment of which candidate would be the right person for the position.
Your task is to assess all the information you have available, and come up with professionally justified advice on who you think the group should recommend the board to hire. You must therefore suggest who should be nominated first for the position, and explain why this is the right candidate to hire.
The advertised position is a management position for a department consisting of ten people. These ten employees vary both according to age and education. The head of department reports to the director and sits on the management team.
The department is a service department that will assist the other departments in the company so that they can optimize their work in the market.
Work assignments – The employment group has carried out a job analysis and concluded that the following tasks are the most central to the position: Collaborate with others. Lead a group of 10 employees. Have personnel responsibility for the employees in the department. Adhere to and report on budget. Represent the department in the budget process. Guide and advise other departments. Characteristics.
Furthermore, they have defined that the following characteristics are important in the employee:
Good at collaborating. Good at listening to others.
Leadership: Gets others on board. Structured
Good communication skills
Can relate to relevant law.
Four candidates remain after the hiring group has made its first rounds of selection.
Here you see an overview of the four candidates, their ability level/IQ, education and extent of work experience.
Anne, 37years: IQ 104, work experience: 12y (8y as leader). Education:
Bachelor’s degree in economy + master in
administration and management.
Tor, 48years: IQ 110, work experience: 25y (13y as leader). Education:
Bachelor’s degree in History.
Lise, 25years: IQ 115, work experience :1,5 year. Education: Bachelor’s degree in economy + master in administration and management.
Anders, 30years: IQ 108, work experience: 8 years. Education:
Bachelor’s degree in Psychology.
Anne describes herself as an outgoing and engaged person. This has led to her always being active in association life, both as a student and in working life. She was leader of the student council when she got her master’s degree, she has held positions as a shop steward at two previous workplaces and she is also active in the kayak club. She is fond of the outdoors. It is in nature that she “charges her batteries” when she has time off.
Tor describes himself as a “simple boy from the country”. He likes people, but he also likes to get things done. He is well organized and meticulous. If you are, says Tor, then you get time to talk to the people around you, you get time to bring them along. That recipe always works. Tor has three children and is a soccer coach for the middle one’s soccer team. The same applies there, good structures make it possible to both get training on what you need to do, but also to see and follow the individual child in terms of challenges and goals.
Lise describes herself as a happy, positive girl who likes to have people around her. If no one else is present, she likes to take the initiative herself to invite, engage and encourage others to various forms of collaboration. Whether it is private such as a backyard sale, a splicing party or a volunteering for something in the local area or in a professional context such as brainstorming meetings, lectures to ensure the sharing of knowledge or arena colleague guidance. Lise is happy that things happen, and she is good at making things happen.
Anders describes himself as an adventurer. He has traveled quite a lot, and took a “year off” after his bachelor’s degree where he traveled and visited all parts of the world. Anders describes that year as an important year that shaped him a lot. He is interested in people and, after his travels, he got involved in a charity project in South America, which aims to build schools for street children in Brazil. In recent years, he has used his holidays to go down to some of the projects to help with his workforce. He grew up with a father who is a carpenter, so he is good at working with his hands.
Berit and Jørgen sit in the employment group. They have interviewed the four candidates. The way it happened was that they took turns asking questions about previous jobs the candidates have had, how they have solved challenges they have faced in the past, as well as a bit about who they are and what they like to do.
During the interview and immediately afterwards, they wrote down some key words for each candidate, so that they would remember the feeling and the thoughts that arose during the interview with the individual candidate. Here is an overview of the keywords they noted:
About Anne: Responsible, cold, conscientious, will get things done. Striving, systematic, clever, energetic.
About Tor: Jovial, cosy, calm, sympathetic, clever, warm and steady.Willing to change? (unsure) , nice, experienced, knowledgeable (appears wise).
About Lise: Wants a lot (will she get it done, or go on without involving others), warm, energetic, clever. energetic, clever, enthusiastic, and really likes the job, knowledgeable. (enough experience?).
About Anders: Great values, warm, sympathetic and inspiring drive, (is he structured enough?). Dedicated and loyal to his own convictions, sympathetic and accommodating
Sources to use:
Arnold, J., Coyne, I., Randall, R. & Patterson, F. (2020). Work psychology: Understanding human
behaviour in the workplace. Pearson. Kapittel 1, s. 1-31.
Rousseau, D.M. & Barends, E.G.R. (2011), Becoming an evidence-based HR practitioner. Human
Resource Management Journal, 21, s. 221-235.
Saksvik, P.Ø., Tvedt, S.D., Nytrø, K., Andersen, G.R., Andersen, T.K., Buvik, M.P. & Torvatn, H. (2007)
Developing criteria for healthy organizational change, Work & Stress, 21(3), 243-263.
Can’t do an assignment? Get it done by a trustworthy essay writing service