Can’t do an assignment? Get it done by a trustworthy essay writing service
At the initial interview the therapist, Kiara, does not provide an informed consent form and touches only briefly on the process of therapy. In discussing confidentiality, she states that whatever is said in the office will stay in the office, with no mention of the limitations of confidentiality. Three months into the therapy, the client exhibits some suicidal ideation. Kiara has recently attended a conference at which malpractice was one of the topics of discussion, and she worries that she may have been remiss in not providing her client with adequate information about her services, including confidentiality and its limitations. She hastily reproduces an informed consent document that she received at the conference and asks her client to sign the form at the next session. This procedure seems to evoke confusion in the client, and he makes no further mention of suicide. After a few more sessions, he calls in to cancel an appointment and does not schedule another appointment. Kiara does not pursue the case further.
What are the ethical and legal implications of the therapist’s practice? Explain your position. If you had been in Kiara’s situation, what could you have done? Would you have contacted this client after he canceled? Why or why not? What are your thoughts about Kiara not doing that? (Corey, Corey, & Corey, 2019, p.156)”. What sections of the 2014 American Counseling Association Code of Ethics would a counselor need to consider?
Can’t do an assignment? Get it done by a trustworthy essay writing service